Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts

21.10.12

"I would put solar panels on it…if I was stupid."



If there was only one talk about Architecture which I could afford to attend each year  - I would choose a 'Klopper Talk'

My first attendance at a Klopper gig was in 2008 or 2009!? The timing doesn't really matter because what is said often stretches between the far past and the ponderings of the present (...timeless perhaps). I remember it as physically image-less presentation and would also allege, slightly inebriated, spoken word performance. It was a cryptic but cutting Bob Dylan like rambling in front of a typical black clad archi-crowd for which I am yet to have witnessed an equal.

So it was with much excitement that I ditched work commitments and attended the Brownbag Talk No.8: 
Brian Klopper - Culture of Culture. 

"What is an architect to do? For that matter - a poor student…Do you give the client or the lecturer exactly what they want because they are paying for it with their money and their marks - not their marks - but they've got control of them? Or do you work for some higher authority like prosperity or as the muse of God? And is it alright to deceive people to get the right solution? Is it ok to use any material or structure or finish to achieve the end you seek? If it looks like a marble column is it alright that is not a marble column? Is it  your role to educate the public to appreciate good architecture (and anyway what is good architecture)? Is it something in the latest European style? Are the practical matters of organisation and environmental modifications necessary evils attached to the more mystical matters of art, beauty or message? And the answer to all this? Well for all complex human problems, as you know, there is one single answer - and its wrong. 

…of course Im not going to give you the answer. You must decide for yourselves."

Image: http://perthsbest.wordpress.com

17.8.12

Curtin Open Day 2012: a SWOT analysis

Strategic Objective: Answer the question 'what is Architecture?' in five minutes or less.

Strengths:
- five or more years experience in impromptu presentations
- your folio (useful as a presentation aid, or distraction)

Weaknesses:
- the proximity of the IA table (when you are explaining the difference)
- Stephen Neille standing next to you while you explain what architecture is

Opportunities:
- teenagers who actually seem interested in what you have to say

Threats:
- disinterested teenagers
- cross-examining parents


Crisis management case study scenarios:

"What is Built Environment?"
Subtext: This is not the sign I was looking for.
"So...what's architecture?"
Subtext: Is this the one about dinosaur bones?

"I need a career!"
Subtext: I/my parents think I should have something to occupy my life, or I/my parents need/want me to have money.

"Oh, you've graduated!  Do YOU have a job?"
Subtext: As if anyone with a job would be here on a Sunday.

"How much do you earn?"
Subtext: N/A

Sarah McGann sends someone over to you to talk about 'the social side'.
Subtext: You had too much fun at university (?)

"It's long and um... hard."
Subtext: Oops.

25.3.12

A little bit of advocacy:


A discussion on a Victoria Park local 'facebook blog' (i.e. a page which someone uses to follow local events, businesses, issues and trivia), copied from facebook.

I have not made the posts anonymous, as they have been made on a public page.


I Love Vic Park
On the corner of Leonard street and Albany Highway, we like it!

 ·  · 

19.3.12

Architecture and Timelessness

Tutoring in design today made me remember a conversation I had with SP regarding the role of architecture and the timelessness of a building. From memory (which is very shaky on the details so I hope I have the essence of his argument right) in his opinion it is to do with the ability of a space to capture a sense of greater being, or a person's core self. By doing so it neglected cultural background, ideological persuasion or fads as all occupants connect to space in through the use of our senses. He put forth a very convincing argument.

Now what made me think of this discussion is that the students are being asked to explore Leon van Schiak's three schools of thought: 'Civic Narrative', 'Technic' and 'Poetic' - for those of you have are not sure what these are, I have tried to give a synopsis of each school below. Be wary though: I have been very reductionist. When considering the timelessness of architecture ideas, I pose these questions to start some discussion:

Do you think that only buildings designed intentionally in a poetic manner will become timeless? 

And if buildings were to designed to other design intents ie. Civic Narrative or Technic, to become timeless do they need to have a poetic quality?



29.6.11

Design Process: MP and the Bridgetown House

After a conversation between AJH, FJE and MP about dissertations, and MP's Bridgetown House Project on a Wednesday afternoon.




With roots in his dissertation on non-proffessional builders, MP has been engaged for design services by a musician couple planning to build a small house on a rural lot outside Bridgetown.

1.5.11

A debate between Christopher Alexander and Peter Eisenman

http://www.katarxis3.com/Alexander_Eisenman_Debate.htm

I thought this debate was interesting and funny enough to make my first post. Christopher Alexander and Peter Eisenman in 1982 debating over architecture of ideas vs architecture of feeling. It's a bit wordy, but it is quite funny. Over-intellectualizing at its most absurd (Eisenman). Or maybe you disagree with me...

1.3.11

Landscape Forum: ‘Understanding Place: the Resource of Landscape’

North Fremantle pic
North Fremantle Heart by Craig Burton.

At The University Club of Western Australia, Hackett Drive, Crawley
Saturday 12 March 2011 from 8.40am to 6.30pm

"A range of distinguished presenters and audience participants will consider the ‘big picture’ of landscape with reference to indigenous and settler history, contemporary case studies and possibilities for the future. The forum will be opened by Professor Alan Robson, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Western Australia, and eminent agricultural scientist.

Speakers include Marion Blackwell, eminent landscape architect and botanist, as well as other landscape planning specialists, landscape architects, an architect, geologist, horticulturalist and botanist.

Please visit www.gardenhistorysociety.org.au for more information and to purchase tickets by Wednesday 2 March."

Marion Blackwell worked on the landscape scheme of Murdoch University, which I think is a very successful landscape scheme employing many native species.

$80 for full time students, $150 for non-students.

10.2.11

Matrix Z: BOOMTOWN Interior Provocations exhibition

In an unhappy clash, PS11 and this opening of this interesting exhibition are on the same night.

However, it should be possible to go the Forum discussion, and then to PS11.

I am not sure if the 'Boomtown' refers to Richard Weller's Boomtown 2050 project, or simply Perth's status as a resource-boom driven booming town, but it sounds interesting. Especially if it's the former - interior projects inspired by a planning/landscape exercise? Great.

Some of our former classmates (IA) are exhibiting, including Emily Durkan, Sheridan Emby and Lance McLeoad


Perth Town Hall - Main Hall and Lower Foyer
21st February 2011
Forum: 4.30pm
Opening: 6pm
RSVP: l.churchill@curtin.edu.au