Said friend Florence (name has been changed) is a business
professional and still recent graduate who is building a home in a newly
developed estate by Stocklands, south of the river. The particulars are; the home is a land and house package by
Ideal Homes, block is 320m2 and house is 136m2 (total area of 182m2 with
covered open spaces; garage and alfresco). The home is a standard design for a 280m2 block and
therefore, Florence has more garden than would be usual. The total package has cost approximately
$370,000 (inclusive of home, land and design variations).
I have asked Florence to share some insights into the
process and reflect on her experiences on the murky topic of; building with a
project home company.
[Image Google Maps of Perth Suburbia]
The sell
Florence
did not anticipate to be actually building her own home this soon. A google search for ‘house and land
package’ & ‘Perth’ had Florence emailing the top three results, one being Ideal Homes, for information. Her only thoughts on choosing the right
building company were to avoid the First
Home Buyers Centre because of the low quality work, which they had done on a
few friends’ homes. The choice of Ideal Homes was made easy as they were
the first company to respond with a phone call. The second company called back later and was declined and the
third company never responded, which is unusually bad business especially in
this climate.
The speed
at which gathering information becomes your home design is rapid and like a Venus
flytrap has an effective power to gather everyone from the undecided to the
gung-ho. The first conversation
established area (a new estate 5 minutes drive from her workplace in
Canningvale which met her price range) and then a meeting was organized. At this first meeting, the neighborhood
information covered the promising amenities of the area (schools, shopping
centre and parks) and a block is chosen off the site plan of the estate to put
on hold. The next question of
having a front or rear garage (accessed from the main street or a ROW), left
one design possible when Florence chose a front garage. The sales person then asked about
variations to the plan to obtain a quote for the build and soon the meeting to
find out about the estate has now established ‘your’ home, in rapid-fire speed. Florence described how they [the
building companies] skip the think about it, to it’s all happening. This left me wondering, how can
architects compete against the psychology of the immediacy of ‘your’ own home,
achieved in meeting one?
Design
Variations
1950’s
Suburb in Edward Scissorhands, 1990
http://flirtwiththepixie.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/33160_512x288_generated__zovyylehhuiy-69fcuk-q.jpg
Changes
that Florence decided to make to the design were somewhat inexpensive and
practical such as a door between the hallway and living areas to create zones
for efficient heating and cooling.
Other items I noted for her consideration were that the window of the
front lounge is east facing (maybe a deciduous planting in her garden) and the
glass sliding doors from dining to the alfresco are west facing, so no skimping
on the window treatments.
A
surprising aspect for both Florence and I, was that as the home was built in a
new estate, Stocklands, as the developers, have their own
set of conditions to maintain a high standard (or consistency) for the area. This is why they include landscaping
and fencing in the package. The
outcome of this, which creates a high level of homogeneity, only helps maintain
the value of the estate. The estate
is therefore representative of the brand; STOCKLANDS. The design implications for this estate
(and assuming other estates also) are the requirements that every home has to
have a two colour [tone] front elevation and an entrance ‘feature’ which is
either a decorative gable or ‘gatehouse’ portico. There are also rules about which side of the lot the garage
[and driveway] are placed. Whilst
we may bemoan that architects only seem to do quirky infills/ extensions or
palatial homes, I do wonder if these conditions help exclude architects from
these areas, favoring sameness over innovation. We could argue council’s operate on a similar basis but the
right to appeal is clearer and their aims and criteria made explicit. Surely the value of estates tied to an
‘unsurprising niceness’ is a chicken and egg scenario.
Another
unknown requirement was that Stocklands
also review all proposed developments for the estate and like an approval body make
their own conditions, which as variations, owners have to meet at their own
cost. For Florence’s home the developer variation was $1,870
to increase the depth of the portico on the front elevation and to include
eaves on the front elevation. This
amount as a variation is therefore an upfront payment to the building company, Ideal Homes. Florence complained about this upfront payment and argued on
why a standard design did not meet all Stocklands’
conditions in the first place. This
paid off as this amount will now be paid at the end of her final account [when
practical completion is reached]. The
developer requesting eaves over the front lounge window to achieve the required
‘look’, is not necessary a bad outcome for the home though.
Finance
Many items
that Florence wished she had known sooner were in relation to finance. This was
most likely caused or at the least exacerbated by an incompetent Mortgage
Broker who was recommended by Ideal Homes. Florence did wish that she had used the Mortgage Broker at
her workplace to avoid some of the stress that she has encountered in the
process. Firstly the mortgage broker
did not understand the concept of HECS, had apparently never encountered it
before and therefore it was a nasty shock when it was explained to borrow the
amount required she would have to pay off her HECS Debt ($10,000) immediately. As a fairly unreasonable ask, this was
resolved with the advice of work colleagues.
Some further
discussion of HECS Debt (the usual punching bag of students) is that Florence
worked out by disclosing her $10,000 HECS debt (apparently this is the one type
of loan that the banks don’t have access to) she could only borrow $30,000 less
than anticipated. By taking out a
personal loan of $10,000 to pay her HECS debt upfront, with this personal loan
to the same amount, she could borrow $15,000 less. This sounds unreasonable, but the difference between HECS
and a personal loan is that the more you earn, the more HECS you pay, unlike a
loan with set repayments (excluding interest rate variations).
One
of the reasons that Florence choose to build is the issue of Mortgage
Insurance, a one off payment that must be paid to the banks if you do not have
a 20% deposit. If you are looking
to buy an established home or just land, you can borrow up to 95% with mortgage
insurance. If you borrow for a build
then you can borrow up to 97% with the mortgage insurance payment rolled up in
your finance (this is possible as the banks assume your house will immediately go
up in value when it’s built, and this value of the asset will be greater than
the finance). Through our
discussion, I learnt that mortgage insurance is non-refundable and
non-transferable, which means you can’t re-finance until you have 20% equity. The recent government initiative of getting
rid of exit fees on home loans actually only helps people with equity, as
stated by Florence.
Another
factor in the finance for project homes is making as many changes up front to
include in your loan. This is
difficult when they only offer a floor plan, however if it is a standard design
what is to stop you asking for the further information such as an electrical
plan (many friends we know who have built, made alterations to switches, power
points etc). Further changes after
finance are called pre-start and they operate on an upfront payment basis, which
is more raiding of the piggy bank.
The Build
The most
positive aspects in this process have been that the build has proceeded without
any major hiccups, and the work appears to be of a reasonable standard (lucky
this is not boom time). Florence
had a small win, when a more expensive laundry cupboard was installed at no
extra cost; the builder had mistakenly followed a variation that had been
cancelled. The quote for the package surprisingly came to the same amount that
Florence had initially stated she could borrow, so cynically Florence mentioned
that she did not know how much extra profit was added for Ideal Homes to get to the same figure.
The only
lack of communication she has encountered was that Ideal Homes did not make clear that as the owner; she has to liaise
directly with Stocklands to organize the
fences and landscaping. To do this
Florence does have to rely on the builder meeting the anticipated practical
completion date to try and co-ordinate getting these items done as soon as
possible.
Reflections
[Home] http://www.thesmokingtire.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/house.jpg
I asked
Florence about the decision to go with a project home company although as
discussed this was helped along by the extremely well engaged sales people. It would seem that not only is it
people’s misconceptions of not having a high enough budget for an architect but
this is supported by how the banks lend money and how the estates are
developed? Maybe with everything
uncertain about building, people just want some level of certainty, which they
can get from a project home company?
This home
is for Florence, a means to get into the market and is anticipated to become an
investment property until she can build her ideal home (which will be designed
by an architect of course).
Florence was aware that an architect may mean paying more per square
metre but ideally with a greater functionality to the home. However knowing that this isn’t her
dream home she was glad to be able to afford this 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home for the time
being. The idea of home as an
investment does not help architects contribute more to this market and I also
wonder how this conundrum helps the populace to retrofit rental homes for
greater environmental efficiency; is an owner going to pay for solar panels
when the person who saves is the rentee?
This aside, Florence just wasn’t sure she could afford an architect to
create an ‘awesome’ home with her budget.
With the market so expensive in Perth it is hard to blame any single
person or low-income peoples trying to just get into the market. I am left wondering is there a line in
the sand between affording an architect for a type of project and going with a
project home company? Would my
conclusions be the same if I had interviewed a couple on a very healthy
combined income who had used a project home company?
0 comments:
Post a Comment